Reply to Why are you not active in your elementary school's parent organization?

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Why are you not active in your elementary school's parent organization?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I understand we don't live in Sweden. Dcps schools aren't funded at a level to provide the aides, social workers, specials teachers, etc that help provide the students, at all SES levels, at our school the education they deserve.  so given that we have chosen to live in DC, I am happy to contribute financially to fund these things. My husband and I actually enjoy the auction (we are extraverts) so we either spend a lot there or just cut a check.

The other stuff I see as "nice to have" but not worth the time I would have to take away from either my job or my kids.  And if other parents stopped volunteering for the "fluffy" stuff our school has (a million field trips, a cooking program, and lots of in school celebrations) such that those things could no longer exist, that would not bother me at all. It is not a matter of "when" these events take place. They could be during work time or during family time.  Either way, I am not sacrificing that time for fluffy school stuff.

Basically, I agree with the npr piece and appreciate it seems others do too. You would never hear that directly from any parent in our school. Anonymous forums are great!

[/quote]

I don't disagree with your approach to PTA involvement but perhaps you are missing my point and OP's point. OP is asking why there are people who don't volunteer OR donate. If you are donating what you can afford then that's all anyone asks of you, you're doing your part. As for all of those events that you don't value, you don't have to volunteer or attend. In my case I donate as generously as I can afford and I work on some programs that I think make a meaningful difference in students' lives. I don't do "fluffy" stuff either if I don't feel like it but the point is I am involved and so are you. That's not what OP was asking about.

The problem with the NPR piece and the other article and some of the comments here is that they rely on a 1950s made-for-TV-movie version of PTAs. In that version of the universe, schools are 100% funded and PTAs are a social outlet for bored housewives. The modern PTA, as I have pointed out, is best understood as an education non-profit that supplements a school budget in providing core teaching and enrichment services. For example Janney PTO budget is $500,000/year and Janney school budget is what, maybe $7-8m/year? Someone can correct me. So the PTA is providing a decent percentage of operating revenue for the school.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics