Reply to Incompetent or a liar?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Incompetent or a liar?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's funny to watch the Trumpkins getting all lathered up over this![/quote]

Actually, it is funnier to watch the Hillarybots twist themselves into unusual yoga moves to attempt to defend her.  [/quote]

Nobody is saying she didn't mess up. That much we all acknowledge. However, no laws were broken and she hopefully learned her lesson. As far as messes go, this is pretty low on the scale. Lower than say, defrauding poor people with a bogus university and buying off the FL AG. Not to mention being a racist asshole. So, since an election does not happen in a vacuum, her screw up matters way less than it might have had otherwise. [/quote]
Well, that all depends on whether you are a biased liberal. Laws WERE broken, but, according to Comey, not intentionally....which is the way he let the liar off the hook. It's like when someone who doesn't have the mental capacity to know that something is illegal - he cannot be prosecuted. [/quote]

Intent was a crucial component of the law, so no, laws weren't broken. Stop the lying.

I am not a liberal FYI.

[/quote]
Intent is not required to consider the law broken. Some unfortunate solider sent his parents a selfie, and in the background was a comouter screen showing some classified photo of a submarine. The guy didn't INTEND to send his folks the sub photo, but still....he lost his position and may even be facing jail time. [/quote]

His lawyer is using the Clinton defense.  It might work as her corruption has set a bad precedent.  Comey did say more or less it doesn't mean other people wouldn't be charged for similar offenses.  So in essence - if you're a privileged corrupt politican who lies, you'll get off the hook.  You and I?  Not so much.  We've turned into a banana republic.[/quote]
Because if the information was classified and was incorrectly marked (missing the classification header) whoever sent it that way is in trouble. No classification header means not classified, paragraph markings do not make it classified, at least in my experience.[/quote]
Do you work with classified info? It is the CONTENT of the material, and not the marking, that makes something classified.[/quote]
Why wouldn't Hillary know this?[/quote]

She did. This isn't the first time she has played ignorant. Remember the Whitewater papers found in the WH living quarters after 2 years.

My SO had a TS/SCI clearance with LSP and worked at an agency and she knows. And she doesn't believe Clinton and does believe she should have, at the very least, been charged and allowed to prove her innocence.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics