Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Zika crisis: each child with microencephaly in US to cost $10 million"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]My child has microcephaly, not due to Zika and not something that could be detected in utero. There is no reason to think he will have a short, painful life. He is a joyful kid and attends a public school. He does have developmental and medical issues and has significantly more medical bills than a typical kid, which are covered through a combination of private insurance and Medicaid. I am pro-choice, but using inaccurate and fear-mongering information about people with disabilities is not a good tactic for fighting abortion bans. [/quote] But if it were detected early and was very severe, shouldn't parents have the choice? [/quote] Yes, as I said I am pro choice. Personally I don't think I would abort a child with disabilities unless the condition was going to cause near certain very early death. i fear that the kind of language being used here--conflating all disabilities or special needs with short painful useless life--is inaccurate and denies the humanity of people with disabilities. [b]It might also contribute to people feeling like it is the "responsible" thing to do to abort children with special needs, an idea I find horrific.[/b] [/quote] It might be in cases of severe microcephaly. That's not horrific, that's reality.[/quote] No, what is horrific is that you just said it would be the responsible thing to do to abort a wanted pregnancy because the child has disabilities. [/quote] No, that's not what I said. I said it [i]might[/i] be responsible to abort [i]in case of severe microcephaly.[/i] I stand by that; there are [i]many[/i] conditions for which MFM will recommend abortion. I think you might be too close to this issue to be reasonable.[/quote] Until the child is born, you will not know the extent of the problems. So, by your basis, you are recommending abortion for all with kids who might present with issues.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics