Reply to Payne elementary

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Payne elementary "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]^^ Should say "LT is clearly the #3..."[/quote]

I would argue that the Cluster "clearly" is....[/quote]

It's a toss up.

-IB for the Cluster [/quote]

I know a few kids IB for LT enrolled in the Cluster (at both Watkins and Peabody); no idea whether the reverse is true.

Regardless, I'm rooting for both schools!  And optimistic.[/quote]

LT parent here and yes, we have several Watkins-zoned families enrolled at LT.  [/quote]

I'm curious if the Cluster-zoned kids at LT are mostly in the lower grades, i.e., PK3/4? The largest cohort of IB LT kids in the Cluster is now in 2nd -4th grade, I believe. [/quote]

Yes, this. L-T flipped recently enough that it doesn't surprise me at all that some IB families originally started their kids in the Cluster and were happy enough so kept them there. I can't imagine families doing that now really, except maybe to keep siblings together. (Not that the Cluster is worse in my mind, just that they're comparable, so I don't know why you'd trek to Watkins from the vast majority of the L-T IB area.) In any case, even if the PP should have said "clearly #3 or #4," their point remains that L-T actually has some of the worst IB housing stock (after only Payne), but the rest of the catchment area offsets... [/quote]

Not sure if you're the same PP who used the word catchment talking about public housing in Payne's boundary above, but I'd think Tyler draws a short straw with Potomac Gardens and Hopkins Apts. Others chimes in that there aren't large public housing buildings in Payne's Boundary
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics