Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Tweens and Teens
Reply to "IUD for teens"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] This. There's a lot of money to be made by too many people if all American parents of teenage girls believe that IUDs are largely without risk and a good idea. I think it defies logic that it would be a good idea to implant a foreign object into a young teen's uterus, which will stop her cycles (if the IUD is hormonal)...[b]all at the very time her body is supposed to be adjusting to its new capabilities and growing[/b]. This is the first generation of young teen women who will be implanted with these things, so there's hardly decades of evidence pointing to this being an actually a low risk thing to do. Yeah, there are plenty of resources saying it's fine...but there are also plenty of resources that claim that epidurals don't interfere with labor...and there are also plenty of studies that say once an old silicone breast implant has ruptured that the leaky silicone doesn't cause health issues. IUDs for teens are likely good as a matter of public health for certain portions of the population who are never going to use condoms or take the pill reliably, but I think they are likely a lousy choice for many individual teens. [/quote] What her body would ordinarily be doing at this very time, without contraception, is getting pregnant and having babies. But we generally agree that this would not be a good thing, right? [b]Right.[/b] Also, why doesn't it defy logic that it would be a good idea to introduce foreign hormones into a young teen's body, in the form of oral contraception (or Nexplanon, the contraceptive patch, or the contraceptive ring)?[b] It does. However, I think the Pill is the lesser of evils mentioned because it is perhaps the most studied medication in history. There's also no device being implanted into the uterus which could damage and puncture it.[/b] And the portions of the population who don't use condoms reliably or take the pill reliably is -- basically every portion of the population. Even affluent mothers with advanced degrees from fancy universities, who post on DCUM.[/quote] Untrue. I know plenty of individual women who take the Pill reliably. Do what you want, lady. You're free to use your daughter as a teen IUD guinea pig. I don't care, and hopefully your daughter won't either.[/quote] Are we talking about individual people or portions of the population? An IUD might be a good choice for a population group as a whole, but not necessarily for every individual person in that group, right? Somebody (you?) said that in the top post. Well, exactly the same is true for oral contraceptives. And one reason why oral contraceptives might not be a good choice for an individual person is that the individual person would not reliably take them. Also, there is actually plenty of evidence supporting ACOG's recommendations on long-acting reversible contraception (including IUDs) for adolescents. You can read it here: http://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Adolescent-Health-Care/Adolescents-and-Long-Acting-Reversible-Contraception Nobody is being a guinea pig.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics