Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Merrick Garland - O's pick for scotus"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Terrible choice -- another old moderate white man. Fuck that. [/quote] You mean like Obama's other nominees, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor? You are an idiot.[/quote] Why nominate someone so old? I am in favor of fixed terms for justices, but until we get them why not nominate someone younger? Why not nominate someone who is brings something new to the court? I would like to see a diversity of viewpoints represented on the court. Garland is very middle of the road (has he ever supported a criminal defendant against the government?) with the same professional/personal background as everyone else on the court. [b]The pick is essentially giving the Republicans the candidate that is attractive to them as possible (w/r/t to both age and ideology) short of nominating O'Connor[/b]-- if you think that's a good strategy then you should be happy with it, but I disagree with that strategy.[/quote] The Senate is not going to give him a hearing, and there is no reason for them not to do so. The candidate is attractive, unobjectionable. They will object anyway. You don't need to worry that Garland is not brown enough or liberal enough, he will not be confirmed. What he is, is prestigious enough to weather a nomination without destroying his career.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics