Reply to Merrick Garland - O's pick for scotus

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Merrick Garland - O's pick for scotus"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's so ironic how defensive he gets in his speeches. I'm guessing if he had a moral compass he's reminded that he voted against Alito and Roberts because of ideological reasons, even though he admonishes Republicans against doing the same.[/quote]

He did not stop Alito or Roberts from getting a hearing. [/quote]

You understand (probably not) that there are 11 legislative weeks remaining in 2016.

11 weeks. That's why there's a throw-away candidate speaking right now.[/quote]

More bulkshit excuses.  The Senate isn't doing squat.  They only spend a couple of days in DC each week.  This is one of the most indisputably qualified jurists in America.  Obama purposefully didn't pick a controversial nominee.  He nominated a white male who sat on the appellate bench with Roberts and is highly respected by his peers.  This could be wrapped up in a month.  [/quote]

Here it comes. We can't oppose the Wise Latina or Justice Kagen for fear of being labeled a bigot, now we have to step aside and let Judy Garland waltz in without considering his nomination. [/quote]

If I understand your comment correctly, you are saying that "we" are supposed to confirm Garland.  Actually, we just want the Senate to vote on him, yes or more probably no.  A hearing, not a confirmation.  Asking for a hearing is reasonable, isn't it?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics