Reply to Donor disparity. 4,000,000 vs. 800,000

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Donor disparity. 4,000,000 vs. 800,000"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The claim has been that Sanders hasn't done anything for the party - and that comes mainly from Debbie Wasserman Schultz who from day one has been completely behind the Clinton campaign and who from day one has been actively sabotaging Sanders and screwing him over every chance she gets.  But even so, the claim that he hasn't done anything for the party is bogus, because he has in fact raised a lot of money for the Democratic Senate campaign.

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/bernie-sanders-regular-luxurious-dscc-fundraising-retreats

The money HRC is raising "for the party", on the other hand, is likely to just be funneled right back into her own campaign, if it isn't already.  DWS is hellbent on making Hillary the nominee and the next President.  [/quote]

Sanders has chosen not to raise money for Democrats this cycle. He has raised $1,000 for them. There's clear accountability for all the money Hillary raises for other Democrats, and actually clear laws about where it has to go. I think the funds are disbursed every month.

Seeing the January disclosures, I kind of understand now why Sanders isn't raising money for Democrats. He wants to push his purity message but his burn rate is also very high. His campaign says they were spending big to win big. Not happening so far. His advertising is concentrated in the whitest states, now, hoping to rack up delegates there. We'll see what happens. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics