Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Infertility Support and Discussion
Reply to "WTF? Ferring Pharmaceuticals Letter"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Surprisingly poor service, considering they are doing this so we won't sure them.[/quote] Dear god, for the eleventh time, you cannot sue them. The laws in this country protect big pharma. Unless you suffered actual bodily harm from using their meds, you cannot sue. [/quote] Calm down. A failed (and later repeated) or even an extended cycle means damages beyond the cost of Bravelle, in terms of other drugs purchased, extra lab expenses etc. It is especially glaring that for women who had their cycles extended or repeated (because Bravelle was under-strength), they had to buy more Bravelle AND more Menopur (both from ferring) but only the Bravelle costs are being refunded. There are lots of causes of action that would seem to support these damages, without actual bodily harm. How about a warranty case seeking consequential damages? Unjust enrichment for the extra menopur they got to sell? And why not state consumer fraud statutes? I'm not saying these are easy cases to win, but they are out there. [/quote] Yes, there's always a basis to sue, and someone always will. See here: http://www.law360.com/articles/714717/ferring-s-muted-fertility-drug-recall-falls-within-fda-rules. There are firms lining up plaintiffs now (though that doesn't mean a suit will materialize). That doesn't mean it's a winning basis, but class actions are funny beasts (and also rarely result in meaningful settlements for individuals while taking years to get there) - they cost a lot to litigate if they're not dismissed (often they cost a lot to get dismissed too), and so settlements happen even if jury judgment might not because ultimately the cost is less (you that useless coupon you get for the product you'd now never touch costs way less than the cost for your failed IVF cycle or potential compensation for side effects). (Again, still don't think it's the solution some people think it is - YEARS to wind its way through the system, to potential settlement, settlement unlikely to make people happy, even if you file individually you may get lumped into the class-action when the court is dealing with it and thus be on their time line, not convinced any legal outcome would be better than the refund checks people are getting now, particularly when you look at the present versus future value of money - just saying as PP said there are absolutely legal bases for law suits).[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics