Reply to Historical records of Jesus?

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "Historical records of Jesus?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why should there be a written reference to Jesus during this lifetime? He was just a fairly insignificant Jewish peasant preacher while he was alive.  Once his movement grew after his death, written references began to appear.[/quote]

If a person is changing water into wine and resurrecting the dead, one would THINK those stories would be capture by literate folks.

[/quote]

No National Inquirer back in those days.[/quote]

lots of gossip though, and stone carvings -- but none of Jesus until much later -- and quess what -- they looked amazingly like other ancient gods, complete with death on a cross, virgin birth and resurrection.  [/quote]

But don't go there, or you'll face the wrath of good Christians on this forum who will accuse you of making up lies about Jesus.  Why study primary documents and artifacts when you can use the bible as the end all?  [/quote]

Really Good Christians don't care about facts or lies.  Their faith is beyond things like "primary documents" and they shouldn't be bothered by people who rely so much  evidence.  It's certainly not Christ-like to argue about facts.  Jesus never did.  Why should his followers?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics