Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Tweens and Teens
Reply to "Reversing the Membership Decline in Girl Scouts"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]The letter posted identifies the reason behind many people's concerns. [quote]I am one of a handful of CEOs across the country who experienced [b]the decade known as the Core Business Strategy ("CBS") [/b]started in 2004 and the subsequent fallout with its failure. As I listened to the faulty research from the "gap teams," faulty data impressions from demographers, and well-meaning people attempting to re-brand our organization, I was worried. [b]It seems a crisis was being communicated when there wasn't one. [/b] In fact, in 2004, the Girl Scouts were experiencing a 25-year high in membership. Despite the real facts, the "gap teams" were suggesting unprecedented and unnecessary changes to six core areas: (1) Girl Program; (2) Pathways of delivery; (3) a new Governance Structure including radical changes to the jurisdictional boundaries of councils, also known as Realignment; (4) a new Funding Model; (5) an entirely different method to on-board and support Volunteers; (6) and, a new Culture for the organization. GSUSA also believed that changing all of these categories, at once, without phasing-them-in, was the best way to rip off the band aid and quickly flip the organization into a 21 st Century success. However, [b]the shock to the collective system did more damage than good and the damage has resulted in this organization hemorrhaging membership, both adults and girls; loss of knowledgeable staff leadership (both locally and nationally)[/b]; disruption to value of the brand; and, creating a state of total distrust, amongst councils, volunteers and community constituents, towards the national leadership. [/quote] Note: GSUSA completely changed the GS program over the past decade. [quote]Here is specifically where we went wrong. First, GSUSA needed to "sell" this new organizational model to 312 councils, CEOs, Board Chairs, members; a monumental task. [b]At that time, CEOs were career-Girl Scouts, in it for life and had worked their way up in the organization for decades. Their staff and boards were just as experienced.[/b] At that time, our membership had a voice and decision-making powers, and exercised them locally at annual meetings and nationally at the National Council Sessions. [b]Sweeping changes could not just be handed down and demanded upon councils with this kind of experience and power.[/b] GSUSA was well aware of this and systematically forced out the old, pressured any resistance and played the "sisterhood" card as often as possible. [b]Offering an irresistible, unaffordable national retirement package for CEOs and their senior staff helped tremendously and much of the opposition walked out.[/b][/quote] Note: The Old Guard left. All we have now are (mostly) inexperienced staffers in Council who weren't in many cases, Girl Scouts themselves! [quote]Reinterpreting the Blue Book of Basic Documents came next. [b]The GSUSA board of directors through direct wording changes and through assertions of interpretation, announced they were making decisions that normally would be vetted through the council delegates "in the interest of moving at a faster pace."[/b] Asking permission of members/councils to raise membership dues or re-organize councils by one-third was deemed slow and cumbersome to the movement. As a result, GSUSA now hands down movement-wide decisions and council delegates gather every three years for housekeeping changes to organizational documents or to keep past board presidents out of the board room. At any rate, it worked. The Core Business Strategy was "sold" as the saving grace that would propel Girl Scouts into unparalleled success into the 21 st Century.[/quote] Note: The Board of Directors took over. It is very hard to get them to listen anymore. More and more grassroots groups of friends of the Girl Scouts are springing up because we want our old organization back! [quote]Moreover, GSUSA needed to implement the CBS in just a few short years (approximately five years). [b]The lions-share of the heavily lifting came from councils who needed to merge with a half-dozen of their neighboring councils (serving much larger geographical areas), attempt to balance budgets and create a cohesive team of staff peppered across thousands of geographic miles.[/b] This alone took its toll and [b]council CEOs were averaging less than a year on the job[/b] before throwing in the towel, unloading the impossible task of managing their "high capacity" council onto another executive just as inexperienced. This turnover continues today. [/quote] Note: Councils merged, much experience and tradition was lost; employees and volunteers demoralized. [quote]To add to the confusion, councils had an entirely new program for girls and a new delivery system to conquer. [b]Every book and badge that girls and volunteers and staff had ever known was gone.[/b] What replaced the program was something foreign to anyone with Girl Scout experience and history. [b]Inexperienced council staff attempted to teach disheartened volunteers the Journeys that were quickly rejected by both the volunteers and the girls. [/b]The supplemental Girl Guides to Girl Scouting weren't enough to turn things around. Simultaneously, GSUSA concluded that the troop model wasn't fresh and the [b]membership focus should be on short-term Pathways for member participation.[/b] Councils should invest in six-week series opportunities or virtual groups of girls doing online Girl Scouts. None of these were ever fully developed or addressed the issue of how the Cookie Program would be effected by short-term Girl Scouts.[/quote] Comment: The program that we all knew completely changed. Right after they merged all our councils and got rid of all our most experienced staff and volunteers. http://gsmembersupportersurvey.weebly.com/uploads/2/0/8/8/20881952/white_paper_2015.pdf[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics