Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Hillary and the FBI investigation"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]^^^^ http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/us/politics/first-batch-of-hillary-clinton-emails-captures-concerns-over-libya.html?_r=0 I think this is the "cut and paste" letter. There are others, too. Pretty sure it is not good for Huma. Don't see how this would just be "sensitive"......[/quote] This article explicitly says it wasn't classified. If this is what the FBI is investigating, it's an even bigger waste of time than anyone expected. [/quote] Not the pp. This is the NY Times article outlining some of the classified information. [quote]Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign and the State Department disputed the inspector general’s finding last month and questioned whether the emails had been overclassified by an arbitrary process. But the special review — by the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency — concluded that the emails were “Top Secret,” the highest classification of government intelligence, when they were sent to Mrs. Clinton in 2009 and 2011.[/quote] http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/08/us/politics/second-review-says-classified-information-was-in-hillary-clintons-email.html[/quote] Yes, the NYT description fits with what the Washington Times wrote about derivative info not properly classified by a State Dept employee who allowed it to cross the air gap, and then someone else later forwarded it to Clinton without knowing it was classified. PP's claim about some other material reflecting the travel schedule is not what's classified. [/quote] I would also think that forwarding the name of a CIA source would be considered classified. I guess Clinton doesn’t think so. Yeah, sure. She knows how to protect the interests of our country. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/10/08/benghazi-committee-blumenthal-promoted-passed-along-name-cia-source-pushed-for/[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics