Reply to Hillary and the FBI investigation

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Hillary and the FBI investigation"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You need to do some reading on how classified info is handled. It is very complex and not easy to spot whether something is classified or not. There are many examples of info freely available on the internet being marked classified, and on inconsistencies in what is deemed classified. Google for any of the agency handbooks on classified info and "derivative" classification, if you really want to understand this stuff.

If you're just looking to beat your chest with specious lines to chant against Clinton, then continue with your ignorance. [/quote]

So you're saying this is too complex for Clinton to understand?[/quote]
No, I'm saying what all the government manuals on handling classified information say: It's incredibly difficult and often impossible to know when looking at a document whether it contains classified info. Therefore, the classification rules set up a complex structure of checks to carry classified citations forward as new documents are derived from old ones.  Often, only the person creating the document will have ability to know what in it is classified. If you are genuinely interested, read some of the materials. If you do, I suspect you will understand better and agree with me. [/quote]

You are making the case against Hillary.  She should have known that, as Sec of State, her highly sensitive communications had the potential to be classified in the complex world of classification you're describing.  YET she used her sketchy personal server for god knows what reason. This is an inexcusable lapse in judgment.  She was putting state secrets at risk.  End of story.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics