Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Racist Matt Damon, typical Liberal hypocrite"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]He totally interrupted her, and then talked over her when she tried to interrupt him back. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njFBkJSpUrY If you honestly think a man would generally be just as sensitive to a female prostitute's point of view than a woman would, I think you're nuts. But I guess I'm not really that surprised that the only black woman got talked over in a room filled with 7 mostly white guys and a white woman. I don't think Damon is racist, but he definitely did a little whitesplaining soft shoe there. I think PP above had a good point about the panelists perhaps being at cross purposes: Damon didn't want to have to change the rules of the contest to make it about picking the best directors FOR THIS SCRIPT, he wanted to pick the best directors, period. Whereas Brown was basically saying, given the script we have, we have to pick the best directors for this script who will be able to[b] deal with sensitivity to racial and gender dynamics[/b], and I don't think our best options are necessarily the teams of two white guys.[/quote] This is bull. A Soldier's Story and Amistad were directed by Jewish white guys. You can be a good director regardless of what you look like. So women don't always need to direct movies about women and black directors don't need to limit their movies to stories about black people.[/quote] Give me a break, it's not about just being "a good director" -- it's about being able to tell the story from an authentic place of personal experience and perspective. I hate to be the one to break it to you, but there are a lot of movies out there that a lot of folks think are "great", but the people who are the subject of the story -- think suck -- the perspective is off, the viewpoint is skewed and it comes off as just another stereotypical piece of mess. [b]Blind Side is a good example. That story was so way off from the "real" story it is shameful. [/b] Give people a chance to tell their own story -- share their viewpoints. [/quote] I only saw this movie on a plane so admiteddly wasn't paying much attention but can you elaborate? I did read Michal Lewis' book because for one thing I love Michael Lewis' style and for the other, I'm a born and raised NY Giants fan and a book about LT's evolution of the o-line was going to be right up my ally. I clearly loved the book and Oher and family never had any issue with it from all the pieces I watched with him during his college and then draft into pro career. But I didn't intensely watch the movie so the parts I saw seemed to line up pretty closely with Lewis' narrative (as he worked with them directly as subjects). What did they veer away from?[/quote] See the link below. The bottom line is very often according to hollywood the saviour and the hero in black people's lives is some white person. It's the White Shadow syndrome. Black folk don't do well until white folk come along and show them the way. http://www.npr.org/sections/monkeysee/2011/02/08/133590180/beyond-the-blind-side-michael-oher-rewrites-his-own-story[/quote] Oh yes, I am familiar with the concept and its prevalence in hollywood for sure. Its just that since I liked this book so much I was more wondering about it specifically, with regard to this concept and if the movie veered off the truth in big ways in order to conform to that concept more so than the facts, since I had my headphones in and out for much of it anyway. [/quote] Sorry, posted before reading the whole NPR article, I see more now, I should have watched the movie and will probably do so now. It was more with the way the narrative was presented- and the fact that while he didn't have play calling football experience, he wasn't totally clueless, etc. Michael Lewis does a better job of parsing all that truth out I am sure than hollywood did.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics