Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Infants, Toddlers, & Preschoolers
Reply to "Youngest kid, smartest kid..."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Anyone read this article? http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/youngest-kid-smartest-kid [/quote] OP, that article from 2013 has been posted many, many times on pretty much every forum that deals with this subject. [/quote] Does that make it less true? Are their subsequent articles/research in the last two years that disprove it? [/quote] You don't really understand how research works do you? The studies (primarily a Norwegian and Swedish study) that the article is basing it's assumptions weren't conducted in the last two years. Here is a similar article and a similar study conducted during a similar timeframe in the UK that draws an opposite conclusion: http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/10/20/should-children-start-school-at-6-instead-of-5/ Sweden starts school at age 7, so the claim the author makes, "a typical Swede, starting school later translated to reduced over-all earnings," means the child started at 8. This probably means that the child had LDs. Why else for the later start date? Norway starts school at age 6 (which is a year early for most of Scandinavia): http://principalfoundations.blogspot.com/2011/08/why-norwegian-school-system-might-be.html The author saying that in Norway, "children who started school a year later had I.Q. scores that were significantly lower than their younger counterparts..." Again there are countless studies that will show early intervention improves cognitive/IQ scores. A child who started at 7 not 6 wasn't able to catch up and probably held back to LDs. So can people please stop quoting this article as the end all be all of "proof." [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics