Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Family Relationships
Reply to "If your ex husband remarried and had a second set of kids"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]Anonymous wrote: Whenever there are more mouths to feed everyone has to give. If the first family had another child or 2, older children would have to get less. Sadly money really doesn't grow on trees. Nope, I don't have to give and I won't unless the court forces me. His choice to have more babies should have no bearing on my finances. I am not taking less money because he has more kids with some new woman. The court order doesn't say he can do that either.[/quote] This. If a man can't afford to have more children without taking care of his existing children, who he has a legal obligation to provide for, then he has no business having more kids. Period.[/quote] Right. But there's no way to stop him and once those other kids are in the picture, his income gets split as it will. The court can't make him create more money though it can take as much away form him as is legally possible.[/quote] What do you mean his income gets split as it will? He has a legal obligation to the first set of kids. If he creates a second set, they'll have to live on what is left after the first set is paid for, as the court decided. [/quote] Except that'snot how it actually works, sadly. If so, men would stop fathering so many kids they can't afford.[/quote] The same goes for mothers - and some men can afford it. I think its interesting that all the blame is placed on the men. Some women break up the marriage and hold the kids hostage. [/quote] Applies to all custodial/non custodial parents. Custodials shouldn't have to suffer because of what NCs choose. [/quote] So, the NCP's are ok to suffer, but not the CP's. The majority of the time, women get custody. Women can cheat and do all kinds of things and still get the kids, alimony and child support and much more and NCP's get shafted. CP's don't need to suffer. Child support is for the kids, not for their lifestyle. If they cannot afford to care for their kids, then let the NCP's do so.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics