Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Another reason why labeling students as being gifted is counterproductive"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So how does explain the performance and being identified as "gifted" for Asians? I'm Asian and NEVER had an Asian teacher/prof until college.[/quote] I was thinking the same thing. However, most of the times the "gifted" label is given to Asians only because of their top performance in various IQ tests administered by the school. In the end, it becomes difficult to explain why an Asian student is not "gifted" if lesser performing students of different races are designated "gifted". I think if there was a class of only Asian students taught by non-Asians, it would be easy to dismiss most of them as "prepped" instead of "gifted". However, in a diverse classroom, the administration probably have to label the Asian kids as "gifted" just so others can be labelled as "gifted" too. I also think that having Asian teachers would actually prevent Asian students from being labeled "gifted" because it would look like the teacher was biased for the Asian students. Not having Asian teachers actually works in favor of Asian students. They are then evaluated entirely on their performance rather than race. And performance is something these students can control instead of race. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics