Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "If you are anti - PARCC are you also anti SAT? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] The 9th grader who is reading at 3rd grade level: Unless he has a bonafide learning deficiency, the chances are pretty good that he's been failed by a half dozen teachers from ES through MS and that's why he's still at a 3rd grade level.[/quote] No, that is empirically untrue. There are many possible factors, only one of which is teachers. The many possible factors are why value-added models for evaluating teacher performance are so complicated and unreliable: http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational_leadership/nov05/vol63/num03/Challenges_of_Value-Added_Assessment.aspx https://www.amstat.org/policy/pdfs/ASA_VAM_Statement.pdf http://www.nber.org/papers/w14442[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
