Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Reply to "Bullis, Sidwell, Landon, Maret, Georgetown Day, Potomac ... does this ranking make sense?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I am a tutor and I have tutored students at GDS, St. Albans, NCS, Landon, Maret, Field School, Bullis and Gonzaga. I think that many people are making comments based on 2nd and 3rd hand opinions. At least my opinion is based on years of working with students at each of these schools. While it may seem appealing to describe a school's overall academic level, it is an accurate metric. Secondary schools - just like colleges - have departments with varying degrees of effectiveness, rigor, etc. I know that certain schools are very strong in math, weaker in science or amazingly successful in English. Next, what is your measure of academic effectiveness? Does it mean that a school gives too much homework every night only to encourage students to cram information to pass a test only to forget shortly thereafter? Or does it mean teachers provide appropriate assignments that build critical thinking skills and encourage an interest in learning? It seems that many parents confuse rigor with hw, tests, etc. I attempt to be brief, but this thread is disturbing to me. Another thing that I observe is parents hire tutors. This is great for me, but what about the child? Sometimes parents are so pressed to get this “academic rigor”, and despite the fact that their child is not at the level, the parent will hire tutors to help their child succeed. Parents are artificially raising the rigor of private schools because professional tutors are essentially writing essays, research papers, etc. All in all, the idea of ranking is ridiculous when considered in a vacuum. Parents need to really think about the needs of their child, the strengths and weaknesses of their child, the culture of the school, the class ratio, etc. I know that this is the real world and at the end of the day students will apply for college and therefore need to appear competitive by attending a competitive school. But wouldn’t it be nice if parents were concerned with something more meaningful than "ranking”? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics