Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
Reply to "Why do so many educated professionals look down on teachers?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]http://www.usnews.com/news/national/articles/2009/12/21/dc-schools-chief-michelle-rhee-fights-union-over-teacher-pay From the article: " Chancellor Michelle Rhee is pushing innovative but contentious ideas, one of which has garnered her national attention: whether teacher pay can be tied directly to student performance." [b]In what other industry would it be considered conentious and gain national attention if pay was tied for performance?[/quote][/b] In what other industry is performance based on variables completely out of one's control? Do your billable hours not have enough to eat? Do they have a bed? Undiagnosed learning disabilities? Disinterested parents? A lack of background knowledge and experiences that the curriculum assumes they have? Oh, billable hours and people can't be compared? Ok, then. Should doctors' pay be tied to the number of patients whose Type 2 diabetes they reverse? Therapists on the number of mental illnesses they cure? Dentists on the number of cavities a patient doesn't get due to their preventative education? Police officers on the number of crimes they prevent? Firefighters on the number of people who don't set their house on fire? By your logic, shouldn't their pay be tied to performance too? As soon as other professionals who work with humans see their pay equitably tied to human performance then I'm all for it for teachers. Until then, not so much. [/quote] Sure, most industries your pay is tied to performance where some factors are out of your control. For example, a person in sales has a sales quota. They have on control over their customers' budgets, which affects their ability to meet that goal. Maybe their key customers are cutting back this year, went bankrupt, etc. Yet, the sales person's performance is tied to if their customers buy. Or think of a project manager. Their performance is judged based on if they deliver the project on time. Their ability to do that depends on all the peopel working under them, as well as many other circumstances difficult to control. Maybe a supplier of a key component is running behind; maybe government permits took longer than expected; maybe there was severe weather and that prevented certain work from taking place. Heck, walk into most retail (chain) stores at the mall, and ask if the head office has given them a sales goal for that day. I guarantee you they have. Can they control how many people come into the mall today and buy? Not entirely -- the weather is kind of cold and dreary today, so I bet mall attendance is lower than on a sunny December day. Yet, they'll be held accountable for meeting that quota, even if it's more difficult than usual. Bottom line is that just about every job has performance goals, and meeting those usually depends on many factors not in direct control of that person. Why can't teachers be held accountable in the same situation as just about every other job?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics