Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Catania's Statement on Boundary/Feeder Changes"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]To the extent that the extra year is to put some more thought into the two? new middle schools, 10% set asides, guaranteed pk3 for title 1, I'm all for it. My biggest hang up with Catania's plan is the focus on no children being redistricted to a worse performing school. School quality is a problem that's much bigger than Hardy not being as "good" as Deal or Eastern not being as good as Wilson. Children who were in bounds for low performing schools who are now in bounds for low performing schools get no promises of quality improvement. The goal is to make Hardy as good as Deal, but if you were in bounds for Eliot Hine and still in bounds for Eliot Hine, you'll just have to wait.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
