Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "Name something that was a COMPLETE waste of money"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Spent a boatload on a doula and then ended up with a scheduled c-section. We knew there was a chance I would have a c-section and was aware that contractually she was not obligated to do anything in that situation, but she ended up making a lot of money for very little work (except some support pre-delivery). If I were in her shoes I would have returned some of the money.[/quote] I'm not a doula, but the money you gave her was also saving your "spot" in line-- if she didn't have you as a client near your due date, she would have had another paying client in your place. If she returned the money of every client who didn't use her or "only used her for a few minutes because the baby came fast" then she may not be able to support her family.[/quote] I get that but we hired her two weeks prior and she said she hadn't had any inquiries at all for our month. As I said I paid and know what we were getting into but I personally would have felt badly about taking the money and would have given some back. [/quote] Np here. Sorry, I completely disagree with your attitude. You had a contract with that doula and you had to pay. It's her career, she can't just give money back when you end up not needing as much support as you assumed you would when you hired her. Labors all go differently (ALL of them), she can't just refund everyone whose labor isn't long and complicated. And why did you hire someone two weeks prior to birth if you were having a scheduled c-section? What condition would you have not known about at 38 weeks that you then, two weeks later, needed a schedule c for? The timeline doesn't even make sense.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics