Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "Home inspection clause -- HELP! :("
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]When you sign a contract that says "inspection for information purposes only" that is what it means. Either you didn't take the time to understand that when you signed, or you made a gamble that there would not be issues and lost. You can always ask, but frankly, if I were the seller with that contract, I'd let you walk.[/quote] I tend to agree. [/quote] I agree, too. The other issue is that this trend towards information-only inspections hurts other buyers. I'm sure there were other buyers who weren't willing to take the gamble OP took and lost out on the bid. I'm the PP earlier who wrote about being worried about water or termite damage. I also stated that inspections usually don't even reveal all of the potential problems. But that is why I would never put in a contract without an inspection contingency of some sort. And yes, there were houses I lost because of that. It's a gamble I'm not willing to take. I think OP didn't think through the as-is part. The questions like "has anyone been living there since 2011?" are questions that should've been asked before putting in an as-is bid. In MD at least, termite problems are different. I think even in as-is situations, termite problems have to be dealt with, but that is stated in the standard MD contract. (at least that is how my last agent explained it). If I were OP, I would walk. But if I were OP, I wouldn't have put in a bid like that anyhow. And at this point, I wonder if the seller can insist on claiming the security deposit if OP walks. Because I thought that information-only inspections DON'T give the buyer an out even to walk if they find something bad, that's what the "information-only" part is. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics