Reply to 2014 AAP Appeals

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "2014 AAP Appeals"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There have been a lot of discussion here at DCUM about the AAP committee not liking the GAI. Who knows if it's true but I have done much research on FSIQ and GAI and most, if not all the information I've found is that GAI should be accepted.

My kid's GAI is 130. FSIQ was 116 which was really pulled down by low processing speed.

When the AART completed the summary sheet for our child's file, she put 130 as the FSIQ.

[/quote]

That was very dishonest of her, and it might not be a good strategy as the committee will see a conflict between the report and the summary sheet.

130 and 116 are quite a bit apart. My ds's GAI would have been in the 150s, but his processing speed pulled it down to the 140s...which I feel definitely reflects his abilities more than a 150s score would. [/quote]

I don't think the AART was being dishonest. I seriously think she made a mistake. Actually she made a few mistakes on the file.  She didn't put the Woodcock Johnson Test scores on the summary sheet. Also found an error on the GBRS on what level service my child is currently receiving. I don't think this AART even liked my kid so I can't even begin to think that she tried to "help."

And yes, I agree that 116 and 130 are really far apart- that's why the psychologist said she needed to include the GAI on the report.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics