Reply to Scalia Can't Accurately Read Scalia

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Scalia Can't Accurately Read Scalia"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Party's over. Bob Barnes (very liberal) posted this a few hours ago.  A) liberal journalists went overboard on the blast; (b) it may have been clerk error (HLS clerks are hoping it was a Yale Clerk) and C) all of the other Justices save Sam Alito, who was recused, also read it before signing on and no one else caught it.  http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2014/05/03/8629d9d8-d231-11e3-937f-d3026234b51c_story.html
[/quote][b]oh, bob Barnes said it so now everyone must agree.

[/quote][/b]

You don't know who Bob Barnes is, do you?  Liberal and has covered the U.S. Supreme Court for the WAshington Post since 2007. [/quote]

I do. I find it laughable that you think if one liberal says something that somehow you have proved a point.[/quote]

Because if anyone posts anything from Fox, Weekly Standard or any other supposedly right-wing publication, the liberals avoid the argument - they attack the citation of the post.  So I offer a liberal from WAPo, the most liberal paper in the land.  That's not good enough for you, so you now say only one liberal isn't sufficient to lay this matter down.  OK, let's add Jonathan Adler to the pot:  http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/05/02/justice-stevens-made-the-same-mistake-before-justice-scalia/.[/quote]

So you are choosing a line of argument that you know is unfair.  How odd.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics