Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
MD Public Schools other than MCPS
Reply to "Black preschoolers more likely to face suspension"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If this was not a racial issue, then the occurrence of suspensions would be proportional to to the number of black kids attending public schools. Its not. Similar to the disproportionate number of black males in prison. We are only 18% of the population. Something isn't right. [/quote] Asians get suspended at half the rate of whites. Clearly teachers must be targeting whites, no other explanation right?[/quote] Sufficiently sophisticated racism is indistinguishable from a complete lack of racism. That is what is so insidious about it. [/quote] Yes, it must be a sophisticated plot by all teachers in the US. I blame the Illuminati.[/quote] There doesn't have to be a plot for a bunch of factors to combine to create a difference in treatment. I teach (middle school, not preschoolers). I'm white. One thing that I fret about is that a good number of my white male students come in with an ADHD diagnosis and a 504 or IEP. Very very few of my black students do. I teach at a school that has close to an 80% black population and is a shade under 50% FARMS. I have one black male with a 504 for ADHD and many white males with a 504 or IEP based on that diagnosis. I find it very hard to imagine that ADHD occurs that disproportionately in white males vs. black males. I think it gets diagnosed a lot more frequently in white males (at least at my school) and this may have a lot to do with SES or something that isn't overtly racist. Here's the problem though; I've watched several colleagues respond quite differently to the same behavior (loudness, getting out of his seat, inattentiveness) from the child with a diagnosis vs. a child without a diagnosis. So the kid who acts like his chair is on fire and keeps getting up and being mildly disruptive gets either a "maybe he forgot his meds today" or a "being disrespectful/disruptive" reaction that seems to correspond with whether the child has a diagnosis or not. That means the kid without a diagnosis ends up with a far greater paper trail of low level disciplinary referrals. I don't think this is because I have horribly racist colleagues. I have wonderful colleagues who by and large are good teachers who really care about the kids. But because there is this great disparity in who comes in with paperwork saying "there's a reason I act like this, here are some accommodations that help me" it (to my eyes) results in a great disparity in how the same behaviors are treated in different students. Kids tend to meet the expectations we have for them and if a kid acquires the label "difficult" or "disruptive" or "disrespectful" then pretty soon they'll start acting the part. That doesn't set a kid up for success. I'm not a special ed teacher or a psychologist, and maybe kids meet the expectations of the label "ADHD" as well, but in my experience the school system tends to be more sympathetic and flexible about that. I try to ask for a lot of the kids who come in with these labels because they are often good, bright kids who do pretty darn well on most days with a little flexibility and positive feedback. On a side rant, I think we do a real disservice to all our kids, but especially boys, by reducing or cutting out recess entirely. So many "discipline problems" seem to magically do better if they have time to move and get rid of energy. My two cents. Arguing that there isn't an organized conspiracy is really a strawman. No one is saying that school faculty and admins sit around on professional development days discussing how they can target black males. Just because that isn't happening doesn't mean there are tons of other factors (many of which are systemic) that don't combine to produce a negative effect. TL;DR version: lack of conspiracy does not mean the system doesn't treat black male students punitively in a disproportionate way[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics