Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Longfellow MS AAP overcrowding plans?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'll just point out again that it's not Longfellow enrollment trends that will force changes at Cooper. It's the declining enrollment at Cooper and the overcrowding at Kilmer, which gets the Cooper AAP kids from Great Falls. [/quote] So it's fair to all of a sudden overcrowd Cooper overnight and force kids into trailers when Longfellow just undertook a nice renovation to increase capacity (I can't comment on Kilmer since I know nothing about their building or future renovation plans).[/quote] Longfellow is at capacity even with its Reno. It is slated to go over capacity shortly. People are not saying to do it over night. This has been talked about for at least a year and Cooper is slated to be under capacity. I don't think it is fair for Cooper parents to continue to deny AAP to their neighborhood children and require them to be bussed all the way across town to Longfellow. I also don't think it is fair for Cooper parents to say they don't want their AAP students but that they perfectly fine for them to be overwhelming another school's resources. Cooper should take care of its own students - all of them.[/quote] The AAP kids attending Longfellow from the Cooper district are a small part of Longfellow's overcrowding problem and the school is not actually at capacity. But Cooper would definitely go over capacity very quickly with these kids being moved over from Longfellow and/or Kilmer, and what's worse, in a building that doesn't even have a planned reno yet. But anyway, the real issue is not just a building and capacity issue. Like the Haycock battle last year, it's a substantive issue about the quality and equivalency of the programs offered. Do you really think the bulk of the opposition to this move is from "Cooper parents" who don't want to provide AAP to their "neighborhood children" or are you trying to spin it that way to avoid the real issue . . . the primary opposition is from parents of AAP students at Longfellow whose base school is Cooper (and parents of AAP students at Kilmer whose base school would be Cooper). Their kids and often their siblings have been attending Longfellow (or Kilmer) for years and they feel just as invested in those schools as you do. And as many other posters have pointed out, no one believes that a Cooper program would be anywhere near the quality of Longfellow or Kilmer for many years, especially in light of the lack of planning on the County's part.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics