Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "The Promise of Socio-Economically Integrated Schools in DC"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Agree, OP. I have nothing against socioeconomic integration but anyone who thinks it is a high priority issue we must enact policy on, because of some misguided belief that it will benefit the poor or close the achievement gap is seriously mistaken. It would probably cause far more harm than good. There already is far more choice in the system now than there was a decade ago. [/quote] There was a study done in MoCo using data from their MPDU initiative that determined that having poor kids integrated into a more affluent school helped the poor kids eliminate about half of the gap. The problem was, this benefit basically disappeared once the percentage of poor kids crossed a threshold of about 20%. My (perhaps wrong) guess is that the peer group effect disappears once the population of poorer children reaches a point where they can easily self-segregate. Unfortunately in MoCo the FARMs rate is about 40%, so even if you wanted to bus or re-district it isn't feasible. DC, I'm sure, is in a much worse situation.[/quote] That's because it's the teachers fault according to most new educational reform, poverty and peer group does not matter. Due to this perspective in DC, robust programs and meeting the students at they're at (their real lexiled reading level and math level) is not allowed, nor is failing students who cannot master content (unless they do not show up for school). As Rhee stated and Henderson has endorsed, if the students are failing it is the "teacher's fault", with that attitude you cannot lift up those students at the bottom and are dumbing down content for those at the top. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics