Reply to SSL Requirement - Forced Volunteerism

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "SSL Requirement - Forced Volunteerism"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There is something very dangerous/frightening about so many parents accepting this and defending this practice.  Talk about a slippery slope to state control!

What happens when, for example, the list one day only includes groups with a particular religious or political affiliation.  Sometimes you need to look at the principal at stake.  I can't be the only liberal on this board, can I?[/quote]

Wait, liberals love government regulations and government programs.  I think you are actually a closet tea partier.[/quote]

Wrong you are.  Classic, real liberals value the ideals of liberty and freedom.   Yes, reasonable and even pro-active government programs for the greater good, but no not government coercion and intrusion.  To see this as some type of tea party thing is way off base.  Please brush up on your understanding of liberalism.

[/quote]

You don't think the SSL program is for the greater good?  Have students or the public been harmed by it?  In fact most here whose children are old enough to have done SSL seem to indicate that their children have benefitted from it.  Perhaps you are a Libertarian.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics