Reply to Love Should Be Multiplied (Sister Wives Discussion)

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Love Should Be Multiplied (Sister Wives Discussion)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]2:21 back. Here's a recap of the suet that Kody/Cody (whatever) brought  (I suspect he was egged on by the producers)  - a fact never mentioned in the series.  Wiki says a hearing was scheduled in Jan. 2013 in federal court.  I don't know the outcome.

*  * * * *

On July 13, 2011, the Browns filed a complaint in United States District Court to challenge to Utah's criminal polygamy law[46] and released the following statement:

"There are tens of thousands of plural families in Utah and other states. We are one of those families. We only wish to live our private lives according to our beliefs. While we understand that this may be a long struggle in court, it has already been a long struggle for my family and other plural families to end the stereotypes and unfair treatment given consensual polygamy. We are indebted to Professor Turley and his team for their work and dedication. Together we hope to secure equal treatment with other families in the United States."[47]

On June 1, 2012, the criminal case against the Browns was dropped.[48] However the suit filed by the Browns remains active after a federal judge refused to dismiss it, saying "strategic attempt to use the mootness doctrine to evade review in this case draws into question the sincerity of [the Utah County Attorney's] contention that prosecution of plaintiffs for violating this statute is unlikely to recur".[49] The hearing on the case occurred in January 2013[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics