Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]If the bio parents were residents of Ok, and the baby was born in OK, the adoption should have been filed in OK. But the adoptive parents, bio mom and lawyer knew OK would not allow it if dad contested and/or as a Native American he or his relatives wanted to make a claim for custody of the child. That is why they gave wrong info on the dad. He could not be found as a tribal member that way. Mom was also on a no report list when she gave birth, making her basically anonymous at the hospital. Interestingly, she did this with her other 2 children as well in order to exclede their fathers, though she is raising those kids. As far as support, once the kid was born, the father would have had to pay being a member of the military. The father gave custody to the mother (or thought he was), he still would have had to pay child support as a non-custodial parent. He never agreed to terminate his rights.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
