Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] So, do you think that Native Americans rapists should have rights to their offspring? Cause you seem to think that the 1/256 percentage of Cherokee blood this guy had trumps the fact that he gave up his rights to the child. Can Indian tribes always petition to control those adoptions? Dusten Brown abused the system because he changed his mind.[/quote] membership to the Cherokee nation does not depend on how pure blooded you are. It about the Dawron rolls. They are independent and have rights Dusten has not raped anyone. The girl and her lawer knew he did not agree to it[/quote] Membership does not, but this kind of adoption is hardly what the ICWA was designed to prevent. But what is the logical conclusion? Sure, Dusten didn't rape the mom, but I never said he did. But by your reasoning, it seems that you think any member of the Cherokee nation who rapes and impregnates a woman has rights to that child? Because that is what you say when you say that the ICWA trumps every other law.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics