Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Why rankings are bunk"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]But you folks are mixing together two different things. A school's reputation, accurate or not, is one thing. The (close to random) rankings by one particular institution following their particular, manipulable criteria, is something else entirely. The former existed long before anyone cared about rankings. Of course an applicant is going to care about a school's reputation, as a starting point before digging deeper. But the reputations exist separate an apart from that one system of ranking. Yale would be Yale whether or not US News rankings existed. But would Washington U be Washington U without the rankings? And should a school shoot up in reputation solely because it is adept at manipulating the particular criteria used by this outside company? And its one thing for someone to say "X is a great school for such and such study," or "I keep hearing that the students at X get very little attention and the atmosphere is competitive." Its another thing to say "X is ranked #4, so I hope my child goes there," or "X is only 26, so even though my child really likes it, I don't want him to go there."[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics