Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Win-win solutions for Brent?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] [/quote] Is this a typo? Why wouldn't under-enrolled schools have their boundaries enlarged? Wouldn't that help their under-enrollment?[/quote] Not a typo. This is the way DCPS thinks and plans. It does seem somewhat counter intuitive. The most frustrating thing about considering solutions for Brent is that DCPS is clearly not moving in the direction of long-overdue, and smart, systemic changes to Hill feeder patterns, but rather in the direction of the odd tweak to ES districts. Any one group of parents or LSAT reps obviously can't address the planning deficit. I'd like to see a lot of changes, including LT closing, SWS with it's own district, Tyler Traditional closing and SI taking over and giving proximity to the entire Hill, Payne and Miner becoming KIPP schools, Van Ness opening tomorrow with proximity much greater than 1500 feet. No point in thinking about any of it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
