Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "OK. I'm game, what's so bad about Peabody/Watkins?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The OP asked what's so bad about Peabody and Watkins. Nothing is so bad. Yet, although its facilities are probably the best on the Hill, Watkins doesn't feel nearly as much like increasingly upscale neighborhood around it as either Brent or Maury. Why not? The Brent and Maury PTAs have knocked themsleves out to reinvent their schools as institutions where upper-middle-class families are comfortable first and foremost, while Watkins hasn't kept up with the times. Brent now has a mostly white teaching staff and student body in a mostly white neighborhood. Watkins has a largely AA teaching staff in a mostly white neighborhood. Brent and Maury spend PTA money to hire aides to provide pullout differentiation. To my knowledge, Watkins doesn't. In-class differentiation is half-assed by comparision. Brent no longer forces students to do structured DC-CAS test prep because the princpal won't play ball with DCPS on that score. What's the point when the school is mostly white, and white kids mostly score advanced? Watkins still does it. And Brent and Maury look a lot better outside than they did around 2005, while Watkins looks worse to me. Watkins needs to adapt to thrive; it will survive by virtue of its location. It's losing more white kids in upper grades than it was a few years ago. Most of my Peabody/Watkins District friends are hoping to head to Inspired Teaching or language immersion schools, with the IB options as Plan B. Do some soul searching Watkins parents, what do you want to be five years from now? Plan C? [/quote] So you're talking 2nd grade and lower at Maury, because Maury's scores are higher than Tyler and Amidon Bowden. comparable to Miner, Payne and JO Wilson, and behind Ludlow Taylor, Watkins and Brent. DC CAS can be misleading, but it's hard to believe Maury is quite there yet when students produce so abysmally in the upper grades. How much pull-out could possibly be happening with Maury's upper grade scores? [b]Inspired Teaching? Really? That must be a fun commute from the Hill to Michigan Park with a 4 year old.[/b] Good luck with that.[/quote] I live on the Hill outskirts, and didn't apply to a single Hill school, in large part because of the nasty attitudes displayed many by Hill parents on this board. Parents essentially make a school, and kids learn from their parents; I didn't want my DC exposed to ideas like those in this thread, and I didn't want to have to socialize or support a school with parents who can talk so freely about not wanting their kid to be "the one white kid in 200 AAs". Do you think your kids, growing up absorbing your ideas, would be so welcoming and wonderful if there's only one AA in predominately white class/activity group? Do you think your prejudices are any less ugly than the kid's behaviors you're trashing? I make the drive to IT every day with my 3.5 year old, and thank my lucky stars we don't have to go to a Hill school. [/quote] NP here--If you are really allowing DCUM to inform your school choices that much, you are nuts.[/quote] +10,000[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics