Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Analysis of Wellesley's graduating Class of 2026 - including that 73% of respondents identify as LGBT"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]LGBT doesn't mean anything anymore. I'm willing to bet the vast majority these are straight girls claiming to be "queer" [/quote] This is an under discussed trend --straight women in hetero relationships announcing they are bi or queer. For some people, not confirming to gender norms in expression is considered queer. So a straight, cisgender woman in a hetero relationship might declare herself queer if she wears her hair short and wears menswear (even if she also wears a makeup and is identifiably a woman). Young people have been using identifications like this to convey their politics and social outlook. It's not dissimilar to the way someone in the 80s might have conveyed their social status or education via a wine hobby or interest in international travel. [/quote] Correct. Most of these women will never have same sex experiences. You can't fake sexual desires. [b]At the same time no one can challenge their identification either. [/b]It's a weird phenomena among a certain type of young progressive women. But all progressives are lemmings and conformist, there is a clear status in their world attached to the LGBT+ whatever alphabet. So are we surprised to see these women take advantage of this clever loophole allowing themselves to "self-identify" as queer or non binary? After all, progressivism is defined by belief, not truth, so you might as well make up any "truth" you want and go for it. [/quote] DP. Why would you want to challenge it? What’s it to you how they identify? And “take advantage of this clever loophole”? Loophole for what? What would they be trying to gain in this current environment?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics