Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "FCPS' plans to address concerns at under-enrolled and over-enrolled schools. "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Parents view schools as monetary transactions. Parents are willing to spend more money for real estate to live in districts with higher GreatSchool ratings. They also don't want to believe that a child will still be successful even if a parent doesn't dump tons of money into a mortgage, and if the kid goes to one of those "lower-ranked" schools. FCPS shouldn't be in the process of using GreatSchools as a means of making decisions regarding boundaries, but parents will fight to the death to keep their kids in certain schools. Because parents believe they paid for those schools. They believe they are entitled to them. And that's why FCPS boundary changes won't happen. Because GreatSchools rules them all.[/quote] I can only think of a few areas of the county where rich areas with 8-10 ratings directly border lower income areas with 1-4 school ratings. Like, very few. And if you then drill it down to “the 8-10 school is crowded and could stand to lose some students” and “the 1-4 school has low enrollment and could stand to pick up some students” it’s even fewer. And in a lot of these areas there is another move that could also make sense and wouldn’t result in as much of a drop in terms of SES of the schools. The reality is that poverty is concentrated in a few areas. And if you start some kind of large scale bussing to more equally distribute the poverty, that has consequences too - longer bus rides, more busses on the roads, more absenteeism, kids/families not feeling connected to their school community because they’re being bussed to a school past 3 other closer schools because someone wanted to balance out the FARMS and ESOL rates. [/quote] West Springfield/Lewis Langley/Herndon McLean/Falls Church Woodson/Annandale [/quote] It’s closer and a much easier commute for some of WSHS to attend South County or Lake Braddock if they need to. McLean is over capacity but aren’t Marshall and Falls Church both basically at capacity? I’m looking at the current maps and they show McLean at 105% with their modular, Marshall at 98%, and FCHS at 102%. They can’t receive students at this point. Langley doesn’t need to lose any students right now. But it will be interesting to see what happens in 5-10 years with their furthest west neighborhoods. So you basically only have the Woodson/Annandale situation right now and that’s it. And as far as I can remember, capacity balancing between these two schools was never in any plans. [/quote] falls church got a big expansion. they tried to move some of mclean there but the parents fought against it. so they moved a large number to langley to lower enrollment. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics