Reply to If not pursuing IB, finance, MBB, are Ivies undergrad really that much better than schools like Rice, Swarthmore, CMU?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "If not pursuing IB, finance, MBB, are Ivies undergrad really that much better than schools like Rice, Swarthmore, CMU? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I get that if you want to be on a CEO track or make big bucks on Wall Street, Ivy names could open more doors. But if you’re pursuing medical research, tech, natural sciences, are Ivies (undergrad) really that much better than schools a tier below?

With AI changing everything, is old-guard Ivy prestige still as important as it has been before? [/quote]

Rice CMU and Swat (and a couple others) are effectively the same boost as ivy+ schools for pHD MD tech and in some areas CMU and Rice are much better than three of the ivies [/quote]

How about Amherst and Pomona? Are they as good as the ones mentioned above for PhD MD Tech boost comparable to or even better than some Ivies? [/quote]

We looked at one of those, so the answer is no.  I guess those kids get the experience later in their academic careers, over summer, or just aren’t hard core basic science researchers.  Plenty of funded researchers are not, although outcomes medical research seems to be hit harder by the NIH cuts.[/quote]

Are you talking about undergrad or still talking about your PhD husband?[/quote]

Why are you being obtuse?  Less sophisticated bench science at slacs, by a good margin.  For undergrads and everyone else.[/quote]

Nonsense[/quote]

Point us to some of the cutting edge basic science research coming out of Williams and Swarthmore.  We’re all ears.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics