Reply to Woman forced to have C section

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Woman forced to have C section "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I would bet that had she delivered vaginally and there was a bad outcome, she would have sued the hospital. [/quote]

Probably but hospital can't force C-section to avoid lawsuit, it has to be medically warranted and patient should've a choice to sign a waiver and do as they please, if its covered by their insurance.

May be this woman was worried about high hospital bill tied to a C-section? [/quote]

It isn’t fear of a lawsuit; it’s fear of death for the patient. They have risk measurements. Obesity, 2/3 prior sections, and a labor not progressing are not good indicators.[/quote]

So what? People are allowed to refuse lifesaving medical care in every other context. We don't strap people down and pump unwanted chemotherapy into their bodies. Why should this be any different?[/quote]

Because at 36+ weeks there's another actual life on the other side of the abdominal and uterine wall, and even under Roe, the state was allowed to assert its interest at that point in time.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics