Reply to Master List: Epstein Confidantes and Consequences

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Master List: Epstein Confidantes and Consequences "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Except, nobody cares.  Old news.  [/quote]

Wasn’t it once the role of the most noble among us to look upon those who had been cast aside by society and welcome them into fellowship and reformation?

Obviously Epstein had issues and the government failed in their duty, but to cancel everyone who ever associated with the man is insanity. I don’t cancel the people in my family who are affiliated with people convicted any crime. If I came across a childhood friend convicted of murder (I have a few to be honest), I’d like to think I wouldn’t just cast them aside or refuse to speak with them. I certainly wouldn’t deem anyone who soaks with them later in life as worthy of cancellation.

This nonsense has gone too far. [/quote]

It’s not about “cancelling” everyone but people taking responsibility for lapses of judgement and morality.  Ignoring is endorsing.  [/quote]

New poster. I am all for going after the co-consirators to the full extent of the law. Anyone who was participated by procuring victims or abusing them, whatever party, should rot in jail. Anyone who knew about it and looked the other way should face legal consequences.

But putting someone who invited the guy to a wedding or even academics who kept up friendships with seedy people because the stupid system requires them to raise their own money is wrong. Utterly wrong. For one thing, if they didn't know what was happening, they in no way broke the law. And morally, these groups have nothing to do with one another. [/quote]

Double standard much.  [b]Listen to all of the liberals all the sudden making up excuses for their Harvard alum and trying to use it as an issue to push their almost unrelated agenda[/b].  I say almost unrelated, because Epstein's agenda was clearly to take advantage of immigrants in an international sex trafficking ring.

[b]So yeah, lets vote in more pro-sex-trafficking liberals, because they raped the girls.[/b]

Nah, I want to see these people with their social double standards crushed in the polls.  I don't care if they sucked billionaires lollipops. [/quote]

I don’t know how much of a sucker you have to be to make this about “liberal” vs. “conservative.”  This is about the Epstein class- people who spanned all political affiliations from Noam Chomsky to freaking Kenn Starr.  This is about a club of people in power who make a big show about politics to divide little people like you but who ultimately see you as fat, subhuman scum.

Don’t believe me?  Look at Kathy’s emails about driving through New Jersey and seeing the fat normies at the rest stop and being sooo happy she’s not one of them.

That’s you, pp.  You’re the fat Normie, and everyone from Trump to Kathy to Howard Lutnick to the Clintons thinks so.[/quote]

I'm just tied of so many of the political posters on this board that think that Epstein somehow reifies their world view and want to capitalize on it politically, when it's really their social system that is the problem.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics