Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Nearly 40% of Stanford's undergraduates are disabled"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wow. When everyone gets accommodations, no one gets accommodations.[/quote] Accommodations are not supposed to be an advantage, they are supposed to remove a barrier that allows the disabled person to perform. Of course with a timed exam, extra time seems like an absolute advantage more than it does a wheelchair ramp.[/quote] Extra time only seems like an advantage to you because you don’t have a barrier that needs to be removed.[/quote] I suspect most don't have issues with accommodations when genuinely needed. It's the abuse of the accommodations by those who don't need them in order to get a competitive advantage that is the problem. Don't be naive, these diagnoses can be bought.[/quote] This is the issue. If you live in an affluent suburb or send your child to private school, you will see that kids who did perfectly great without accommodations decided around 9th or 10th grade to get an MD to diagnose them for anxiety or ADHD in order to get more time on standardized tests. There is rampant abuse of the system - the 40% probably reflects about 40% of the kids at many private schools (or wealthy public schools). [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics