Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "Winter BIC"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It’s worth saying out loud: a large portion of player rankings require payment just to be evaluated. Many athletes and families opt out because they value development and performance over purchasing a star rating. Within the sport, it’s widely understood how these rankings are generated.[/quote] In the boys 2027, almost every single 4, 5 and top 100 player was committed before anyone else. Exceptions were exceptionally high gpa’s and personal connections. Schools rate players and reinforce those decisions with players slotting up or down. [/quote] Those players would have already been highly sought after by top schools even before star and numerical ratings came out. Y'all are trying to understand how rankings, ratings, BIC invites, and early commitments are interconnected, but are overlooking the causal factor behind all of these: actually being good at lacrosse and/or demonstrating significant potential.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
