Reply to Realignment for SEC

Forum Index » Jobs and Careers

Reply to "Realignment for SEC"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The people at the SEC are such whiny complainers.  We could do a lot worse than Atkins. It seems clear some people are just complaining about things they don’t know anything about. Atkins cares about enforcement, so don’t know where that came from.  I can’t speak for EXAMS but Judge Ryan is wicked smart and takes no crap.  A lack of securities law background might be a problem for some but not her.

I agree about the telework though. We have many people just hanging on by a thread.[/quote]

Wow, someone drank the kool-aid. I don't care how much sweet-talking they do and how sharp they come across, having a background in securities law, or at the very least some relevant industry experience should be a requirement for the heads of Exams and Enforcement. Would Google or OpenAI employ Chief Counsels without experience in a big tech company or someone with a mechanical engineering background for their Head of Engineering roles?

The fact that the [b]regulator for the world's largest and most complex financial markets[/b] has people in these positions without a securities law background is a signal to industry how seriously we are taking it. Also, you can just look at the number of Enforcement cases dropped in the crypto space and judge for yourself if the SEC is taking Enforcement seriously. [/quote]

Yeah, that's not the SEC. The derivatives markets are orders of magnitude larger and more complex. Nice try though. [/quote]

lol well, you don’t want to know who is running the CFTC then [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics