Reply to Erika Kirk "formally" endorses JD Vance for 2028, 3 years ahead of presidential election

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Erika Kirk "formally" endorses JD Vance for 2028, 3 years ahead of presidential election"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]FWIW my kids went to ND, HC and BC (not necessarily in that order)

And they are graduates of the Catholic Conference HS system + Ursuline

No one needs an annulment these days, that’s stuff that’s like 70 years old[/quote]

If you have a marriage recognized by the Catholic Church, divorce, and want to remarry with your new marriage recognized by the church (as a sacrament) you do have to get a Catholic annulment.

In JD's case, his marriage is valid even though it wasn't Catholic to begin with. Usha would have to convert for their marriage to be recognized as a Catholic marriage. If he divorced, he would still have to get an annulment through the church to have a Catholic (recognized as a sacrament) marriage with another Catholic.

[/quote]

That’s all pretty valid. But my very Catholic in-laws certainly recognize every single marriage conducted subsequently without Catholic oversight

Just cruise ship vacation type stuff.

I think I was the 1st and only one before SIL changed up the game and in-laws got all upset that the Catholic Church didn’t somehow consider them special and give them a dispensation. She was already pregnant anyway.

I was still a parent in the days when CCD got you out of athletic practices on Wednesday evenings and the team was at half-staff.

Do not know if they do that anymore. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics