Reply to Why do lawyers in my field insist on listing their Alma maters on their resumes, even after they’ve been practicing for

Forum Index » Jobs and Careers

Reply to "Why do lawyers in my field insist on listing their Alma maters on their resumes, even after they’ve been practicing for "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]I’ve been practicing in biglaw for twenty years. There is a very strong, but not perfect, correlation between law school and capability. People from the top five law schools tend to be cerebral but not great practitioners. People from t6 to around t50 tend to be comparably very strong. Beyond that, you’re likely to find a significant decrease in quality. Also, I’m only talking about the people who have already been screened into biglaw. So in t14, that’s probably the top half or more of the class. In t50 it’s probably the top third. After t50 I think you need to be top ten or twenty percent. But even then, the quality typically significantly drops compared to your average t15 biglaw attorney.

Note this is all averages. I just fired an incompetent associate from Yale law. And one of the superstar equity partners in my group went to a “directional” law school in the Midwest I’d never heard of. But there are definitely trends.

If you’re outside counsel choosing your law firm counsel, you absolutely should pay attention to both school and law firm, because these are going to be the strongest predictors of competency. Theres no objective other way for you to gauge skill set or experience .[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics