Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "Are Tattoos a Sin?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Or is that so Old Testament that modern Christians can ink away?[/quote] Where in the OT are tattoos even discussed? [/quote] Clear as day. Per Leviticus 19:28, “You shall not make gashes in your flesh for the dead, or incise any marks on yourselves.[/quote] This I love how bible thumpers get tattoos of the cross but don't know the above is in the bible. [/quote] Christian here. I knew that was in the Bible. Reformed Protestant Christians (my tradition) believe that when Jesus Christ came, lived a sinless life fully fulfilling God's entire law to ancient Israel, died, and was raised again that was that for the law. The old covenant between God and his people was finished, completed by Christ himself. Now there's a new covenant. Under that new covenant the ceremonial law (like that verse in Leviticus) and the civil law (all the rules governing the government of Israel) no longer apply. Since the moral law - which is best spelled out in the 10 commandments - existed in the covenants before the old covenant, then it still applies. But the rest of it doesn't. Before mocking Christians, you should check to see if we've actually...thought about stuff. You do realize entire PhDs exist in theology, right?[/quote] NP. This. Jesus brought in a new covenant. He discouraged religious bean counting and emphasized just two OT rules: love God, and love your neighbor. In fact, he said to go beyond loving your neighbor and love your enemy too. He also broke other specific OT rules, for example re consorting with unclean people (tax collectors lol and prostitutes) and specifically said that dietary rules were unnecessary (“it doesn’t matter what goes in your mouth, it matters what comes out of it”). So Christians are adhering to Jesus’ message by not getting fussed about Leviticus’ rules about clothing or tattoos. [/quote] This is what gets me about Christians. They disregard all the facts pointing out the flaws and inconsistencies in the Bible, since the only way to overcome the cognitive dissonance is to revert to the "Jesus is love" idea. This is tantamount to saying that Santa is real because "Santa is charitable and generous" and only has one rule: naughty or nice. [/quote] The gospels are actually quite consistent and the message is much deeper than what you're pretending. This is what gets me about anti-Christian trolls: they post uneducated nonsense about tattoos that they read in some atheist chat group. Then when that doesn't work, they massively oversimplify the gospels. [/quote] The gospels are only consistent because they plagiarized off each other = mark, then matthew and luke, then john. You are also ignoring the fact that the rest of the Bible is not consistent, and completely contradicts itself. This is what happens to a book that has multiple authors across different generations. Perhaps the theist troll should try to understand more facts. [/quote] No, scholars who adhere to the Q Source theory about the Gospels--which is hypothetical, anyway--don't claim that John was part of it. And positing a single source for the bones of a story (which imo has some logic) still doesn't explain why the gospels read so differently or why each includes some different sets of new but consistent facts--compare Matthew to Luke, for example. Also, no Christian alive has any problem with the New Testament contradicting the Old, because Jesus explicitly said he was contradicting the Old. The ignorance here is jaw-dropping. [/quote] Ignorance is believing a compilation of bronze-age fictional parables are real. [/quote] Ohh, good one, troll. :roll: [/quote] Be nice to the Christian. He can't help being gullible. :lol: [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics