Reply to J.D. Vance: A complete black whole of charisma

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "J.D. Vance: A complete black whole of charisma"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Vance isn't as weak as people assume. Tim Walz was supposed to be the affable, likable, and charismatic alternative to Vance. But JD Vance absolutely won their debate. It wasn't even close. Vance was polite, confident, and well-informed. I wouldn't underestimate him.

But a lot depends on who Democrats choose as their candidate. As we've seen in recent years, Democrats have lost the trust of the vast majority of Americans. Biden and progressives were a disaster for the Democratic brand. And a lot of it is based on some very core issues - soft on violent crime, chaotic public schools, encouraging millions of illegal migrants to undermine the wellbeing of the working class, the extremism of Covid school closures, and on and on. People don't trust Democrats.

And that's hard to overcome. If Republicans end up choosing someone like Rubio or even Haley, I don't see Democrats winning with the current list of names - especially Newsom, who is way too slick to win Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin, North Carolina, and other swing states. Trump may be a disaster. But Democrats are still in a world of trouble. [/quote]

No neocon is going to win the ticket. Anyone who hung their hat on this presidency can no longer claim they're America first on the political right, and this is probably going to be a litmus test. Especially the ones were seen as more normal before joining the admin like Rubio and Haley. There's too much anger brewing in the populist right and if people don't see it yet, it's coming. Some people, many with fairly large platforms, on the right are calling out Epstein, Butler, Kirk, Patel, Israel, Ukraine, Argentina, etc., as well as things like the economy/inflation/soldiers not getting proper healthcare (as well as soldier suicides). Hegseth lost a portion of the military with his patronizing of senior command. Dems need to hit all of these points consistently and [u]stay the eff away from social engineering issues[/u]. It literally means for the white middle-aged SJW Karens to stfu (i.e., the [url=https://archive.ph/20201110084203/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/10/how-suburban-women-are-remaking-democratic-party/616766/]wine moms[/url] and the [url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/inside-minds-older-left-wing-women-driving-new-voting-bloc-resistance-grandmas-opposing-trump]resistance grandmas[/url]). There's going to be an internal fight in the Republican party unless Libs give them a reason to find a common target. On the Dem side, need to find a non-politician outsider with little baggage that's independently wealthy and not from the left coast—basically someone who can't be typecast and has a real policy platform from the jump.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics