Reply to Easier for girls to get into top engineering schools?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Easier for girls to get into top engineering schools?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]As an MIT alum interviewer, let me shed some light on the MYTH of easier admittance for girls.

Yes, a higher % of female applicants gain admission. What you don't see is the noticeable fraction of unqualified applicants (e.g., kids who like video games and are encouraged by clueless relatives to apply to MIT). This misguided group is virtually all male. Bizarre phenomenon.[/quote]

Those video game males are bottom applicants and irrelevant.  What matters is the top 2% of applicants.  Top 2% of male applicants are extremely strong at math.  Look at who is winning the hardest math and programming competitions.[/quote]

You are missing the point. DP.  PP was explaining that the whole pool is different. Admitting 2% of the male applicants when a significant portion of them are noticeably unqualified, yet admitting 3% of the female pool when almost none are unqualified means the admission rates of the qualified males v females is about the same, depending on the size of the unqualified male subset. The "listed" % admission for male v female does not tell the story. 
PP is not the first one I have heard explain the same, and it correlates with the local stem magnet. About 1/3 are females. They apply in 8th. The male v female SAT range total is the same (median is 1500 so it is a highly skewed group of students, they are all very intelligent). The females dominate the top 25%, which is announced senior year. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics