Reply to harvard won?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "harvard won?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Harvard may have won in court yesterday, but that ruling only protects current grants. Going forward, agencies can simply choose not to award new money. Over time, losing access to fresh grants will hurt far more than the short-term win they just secured.[/quote]

Well, there's a few recent data points indicating that the voters are actually not impressed with some of the choices made by the Trump administration.   It remains to be seen whether this crapping all over science research is permanent or temporary.[/quote]

If Harvard only gets grants during democratic administration, they are cooked.  Nobody is actually on Harvard's side they are just pissed at Trump.

If the research happens at Texas A&M instead of Harvard, nobody will care[/quote]

And then the Democrats come into power and they take away the research from Texas a&m and give it to Harvard?  That is a  horrible recipe for progress in scientific research.

There's a competitive process to get the research grants as there should be.[/quote]

Yeah but you can exclude the anti-semitic schools like harvard from consideration.

Like the president couldn't say that it was categorically wrong to call for the genocide of jews.  Remember, THAT'S the sort of institution we are dealing with.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIVDL57yRN0

This was also the person who pushed Ronald Sullivan out of his deanship for representing Harvey Weinstein.  Apparently you can call for the genocide of jews but you cannot represent a scumbag.  The first amendment freedom of association was not important to protect in that situation but free speech is important to protect when calling for the genocide of jews?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8M8pip9A1og

This is also the person that tried to get Roland Fryer's tenure revoked and fired because he published a paper that concluded what is now widely accepted, police show racial bias in the use of excessive force but do not show racial bias in use of deadly force.  This undercut the BLM narrative and Claudine gay ruined the career of one of america's best young economists because he would not say the things they wanted him to say.  Free speech and freedom of thought was not important to protect in that situation but it was important to protect when calling for the genocide of jews?

Harvsard has had a good run, but it might be time to shut it down.  Revoke its tax exempt status and stop federal funding.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics