Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "harvard won?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Judge invalidates Trump admin’s Harvard funding freeze [/quote] The judge is Alison Burroughs. She always rules in Harvard's favor. [b]She is the one that ruled that Harvard wasn't discriminating against Asians in the face of obvious discrimination against Asians. [/b] This ruling will be appealed and the first circuit will also rule in Harvard's favor and then it will go to the Supreme Court where they will settle the matter. [/quote] And that ruling was held up on appeal and was not included as part of the final appeal to the Supreme Court. And the issue decided by the Supreme Court had nothin to do with that finding.[/quote] She was still clearly wrong and engaged in contorted reasoning to get to her conclusion.[/quote] I suspect that the appeals court that completely upheld her decision doesn't agree with you. Arcidiacono's work in support of SFFA was sloppy with very tortured reasoning. It was inadequate because it was developed to achieve the desired result as would be expected in this case. The problem was that Professor Cards rebuttal was far more comprehensive, taking into account far more weighed variables than Arcidiacono's model and very clearly showed no discrimination. It wasn't a difficult or contorted decision at all. [/quote] Yeah, they were wrong too. Arcidiacono's analysis was pretty spot on. He made Card look like snake oil salesman. And David Card's analysis was fekkin embarassing. His entire analysis relies on that the difference in personal ratings was somehow justifiable outside of the admissions office's desire to racially balance the incoming class. I don't know how card lives with his intellectual dishonesty in that case. I hope the paycheck was worth it.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics